Culture on My Mind – Star Trek at Fifty

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Star Trek at Fifty
September 7, 2016

st-tos-remastered

Happy 50th anniversary, Star Trek!

Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. It’s continuing mission: To explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before.

My first memories of Star Trek are spending mornings with my parents on weekends watching back-to-back reruns of the original series and Lost in Space. They must have known that they had a fan on their hands when I asked my dad one day if we could construct the Enterprise out of Legos. We didn’t watch much of The Next Generation in first-run syndication, but we watched every one of the movies with the original crew at every possible chance, and I caught up later after Star Trek: Generations and my good friend Ryan McCarthy rekindled my passion for the franchise in the mid to late 1990s. After that, it was almost appointment watching for each series and film.

There was a rough time in my fandom in the era around the end of Star Trek: Enterprise and the debut of the JJ Abrams films, which I credit to a wave of “true fan” negativity that spread virally through the internet. With the resurrection of the franchise under Abrams, I was able to overcome my conflicted emotions and determine that it really didn’t matter what other fans thought. I realized that my fandom is mine alone, and my passions cannot be helmed by the fickle attitudes of the internet.

I often used Star Trek quotes in my essays for school and college, and I patterned my writing style off of the authors I read as I grew up, including so many in the continuing voyages.

Star Trek truly helped form me into the person I am today.

My favorite series is Deep Space Nine, followed by The Next Generation and Voyager in a close second. I truly believe that Voyager gets a lot of undeserved flack for its seven-year run. It had a lot of problems, especially in the strict adherence to the Trek writing formula, but it also returned to the core of the franchise in exploring the unknown. I wanted more conflict between the Starfleet and Maquis crews, and I wanted Voyager to be less pristine after all of the conflicts. They made a big deal out of conserving power and replicator rations, but the ship was nearly always flawless. I always point to the reimagined Battlestar Galactica as an example of what I expected, but with a much lighter story.

Deep Space Nine was unique because it turned the tables on the Trek formula in exploring the human condition by bringing the galaxy’s diversity to the characters. I loved the explorations of faith and religion, as well as the link to faith-based conflict and the American fascination with war. My single contention with DS9 is how the Bajoran story was left unresolved: Instead of ending the series with Bajor finally being admitted to the Federation, the show ends with the resolution of the Dominion War, which was not part of the overall premise.

My least favorite series is Enterprise, mostly because of the chaotic mess that it was. In an added moment of truth, I have yet to sit down and watch the entire animated series.

My top films are The Voyage Home, The Wrath of Khan, First Contact, and Star Trek Beyond. My least favorites are The Final Frontier, Into Darkness, and Nemesis. Between those poles, the order shifts around substantially. The Motion Picture does the most amount of moving because it’s a beautiful picture and among the most Trek of the franchise, but it’s also very slow and deliberate. It is very much a Robert Wise film.

My favorite captain is Sisko because I see a lot of myself in him. He’s emotional and conflicted, but he’s also willing to go against the Starfleet bureaucracy to get things done. Picard and Janeway are close seconds.

My favorite characters are the Prime Universe Spock and Data, though the Kelvin Universe version of McCoy is rapidly climbing the ranks to join them. I admit that Spock and Data have suffered a bit in my eyes with their latter appearances. Without a doubt, my least favorite character is Voyager‘s Kes because of the sheer amount of untapped potential and wasted story in that character. She could have been so much more.

My favorite ships are the Defiant and the Enterprise-D.

I also have two favorite Star Trek podcasts. The first is Women at Warp, which is a podcast that explores the Trek universe from a woman’s point of view. It has helped me to see many aspects of the franchise from a different point of view, and they are always respectful and thoughtful with their analyses. The second is Mission Log, which is an excellent episode-by-episode review of the franchise with some additional supplemental material from the Roddenberry archive. One of my favorite elements of this show is producer Rod Roddenberry’s journey as he comes to terms with his father’s legacy.

I am very excited for the future of the franchise, including the greenlit fourth Kelvin Universe film, and I am happy to see the return of Trek to television with the upcoming Star Trek: Discovery. The future is bright, and it has the potential to inspire future generations as it helped inspire me.

My deepest gratitude goes out to the casts and crews, authors and artists, game studios, and my friends and family for keeping this ship flying for fifty years. May she continue to boldly go for many more.

startrek50th

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Best Day of Television

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Best Day of Television
June 5, 2015

A meme has been making the rounds on Facebook about getting children into nature, claiming that kids “don’t remember their best day of television.” Thankfully, many of the people in my geeky circles have torn it apart with their best life-changing television memories.

Photo originally posted by the Children & Nature Network page on Facebook

Mine was May 23, 1994. The episode was “All Good Things…”, the series finale of Star Trek: The Next Generation. It was the first time I had ever seen a television show do what is now considered a proper wrap-up of story lines from the series, and it still ranks up there with “Goodbye, Farewell, and Amen” from M*A*S*H as one of my favorites farewells in television history.

While the Children & Nature Network has a point in unplugging kids and getting them into the world around them – I spent a great deal of time in nature and away from tech in my youth over many years working on my Eagle Scout award and as a volunteer Trail Patrol member at Antelope Island State Park – this meme easily glosses over the effect that good television has on people. Good stories, regardless of medium, transport your imagination away from the burdens of reality and allow you to dream and hope, and fosters creativity.

Yes, even kids can understand the burdens of the real world and create imaginative wonders to solve them. Anecdotally, I know a successful filmmaker and writer who escaped abuse at home through the wonders of Star Wars. A more concrete example is the duo of Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, the high school teens who created Superman to battle the social injustices of the 1930s.

My love of speculative fiction stems from being introduced to Star Trek and Lost in Space by my father, and the plethora of action, adventure, and science fiction that dominated the 1980s television landscape. My imagination is still fueled by those memories to this day.

In the end, kids will remember their best days so long as those days are spent seeking their bliss. The trick is finding out what fuels their passions while guiding them into the world at large. All things in moderation.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Leonard Nimoy (1931-2015)

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Leonard Nimoy (1931-2015)
February 27, 2015

It’s difficult to fathom right now, but a legend is truly gone.

Leonard Nimoy, icon of the stage and screen, has died at the age of 83.

Similar to most fans of his work, I knew him best as the stoic Mr. Spock in the Star Trek franchise. In that role, Nimoy portrayed a half-human, half-Vulcan science officer who was (supposedly) devoid of emotions and driven purely by logic. Ironically, he was the lens through which the show could analyze the human condition. His character acted in concert and counterbalance with McCoy’s emotion and Kirk’s authority, and became an Aristotelian trifecta by embodying logos, punctuated by pathos and the ethos of expertise and (later) command. Spock was perhaps the most well-rounded and defined character in the franchise.

Mr. Spock helped me in my youth as a role model for my awkwardness and gracelessness in social situations. Spock was an outsider among the Enterprise crew, but was well-respected for being an expert in his field and was also a valued friend. He was my favorite original crew member.

Of course, Mr. Nimoy was more than Spock. Beyond Star Trek, he was an accomplished actor, both on screen and stage as well as off screen with his fantastic and easily recognizable voice. He also was a director, producer, writer, singer, poet, and photographer.

I had the chance to see him on a panel at Dragon*Con, and his candor and humor was admirable. He sparred quite well with William Shatner on that stage, and his passion for life was palpable.

He was a quick wit, a true artist, and a kind soul.

It’s easy to say that he will be missed. It’s hard to quantify just how much.

 

Spock Chair

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Shelving the Star Wars Expanded Universe Makes Sense

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Shelving the Star Wars Expanded Universe Makes Sense
May 4, 2014

I’ve been thinking about the recent shake-up in the Star Wars expanded universe, and it’s taken me some time to really sort out my thoughts both in relation to my emotions and good business sense. I agree with the decision, and believe that it makes sense to do it.

Part I – The Books and Me

It seems fitting that this decision was made public around this time of year. I was introduced to the post-Return of the Jedi adventures of Luke, Leia, Han, and Chewie on Easter Sunday of 1992. My parents surprised me with a paperback copy of the Star Wars Trilogy 10th anniversary omnibus, which combined the novelizations of each of the original films, along with a paperback copy of Timothy Zahn’s Heir to the Empire. They realized that I had a deep attachment to the original trilogy, which I had only seen on well-loved and rewind-worn pan-and-scan VHS tapes at that time, and they fed that passion with what they understood to be the continuing story. They were right on the money, as confirmed by the hardcover version’s inner jacket blurb.

The three Star Wars films form a spectacular saga of bold imaginations and high adventure. But the stories of its characters did not end there. Now for the first time, Lucasfilm Ltd., producer of the Star Wars movies, has authorized the continuation of this beloved story. In an astounding three-book cycle, Timothy Zahn continues the tale of Luke Skywalker, Princess Leia, Han Solo, and the other characters made world famous by Star Wars, as he brilliantly expands upon George Lucas’s stunning vision, “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.”

I rapidly devoured the original trilogy omnibus, and relished the differences between the novels and the films. Obi-Wan knew about ducks, Luke’s uncle Owen was really Kenobi’s brother, and Vader was created when Anakin and Obi-Wan battled on the edge of a volcano. It was a wealth of information that expanded beyond the cinematic journey, and it primed me for the more dedicated reading of the continuing saga. I say dedicated, but I don’t mean meticulous; I flew through Heir to the Empire and loved every minute. In June of 1992, I reserved a copy of the second book, Dark Force Rising, at my local library and flew through it as well. It was a long year until The Last Command was released, and after that epic conclusion, I satiated my desire for more Star Wars by reading Brian Daley’s The Han Solo Adventures, L. Neil Smith’s The Lando Calrissian Adventures, and Alan Dean Foster’s Splinter of the Mind’s Eye.

It didn’t matter to me how bad Splinter was because, by the Maker, I had new Star Wars in my hands. The Truce at Bakura, The Courtship of Princess Leia, and Kevin J. Anderson’s Jedi Academy trilogy started me down a path of buying the books and comic trade paperbacks when they came out and enjoying every one of them. My palette has matured a bit since then, and stories like The Crystal Star (ah, Waru) are hardly ever revisited by my eyes, but at the time, they were precious, precious gold.

Despite my love for the franchise, it became apparent to me that the universe was getting too large too fast. At that point, stories in what became the Star Wars Expanded Universe (SWEU) ranged from approximately 5,000 years before to around 20 years after A New Hope. One person at Lucasfilm, Leland Chee, was charged with keeping the chronology straight and smoothing over any conflicts amongst the novels, comics, video games, television series, and movies. He did an admirable job, and it’s one I don’t envy.

By 1994, Lucas Licensing had defined what made up Star Wars canon, and publicized it in issue 23 of Star Wars Insider, the fan club’s magazine.

Gospel, or canon as we refer to it, includes the screenplays, the films, the radio dramas and the novelizations. These works spin out of George Lucas’ original stories, the rest are written by other writers. However, between us, we’ve read everything, and much of it is taken into account in the overall continuity. The entire catalog of published works comprises a vast history—with many off-shoots, variations and tangents—like any other well-developed mythology.

To help sort out the chronology, multiple tiers were established between 1996 and 2000 to solve conflicts between stories. Anything that directly involved George Lucas, such as the films, their novels and radio adaptations, and statements from Lucas himself trumped everything. Under that were the television shows, followed by the combination of novels, comics, and games. As the prequel movies dawned and Lucasfilm started developing The Clone Wars television series, more and more continuity problem started to crop up and it was apparent that something had to give. In the time-honored tradition of the SWEU, George Lucas won.

Part II – The Dawn of a New Era

The decision on April 25th to essentially shelve everything except the six core films and The Clone Wars isn’t a big surprise. In fact, it’s been a long time coming. As much as George Lucas has changed his mind on sequel films – at first it was a twelve-film series, then nine, then six. As recently as May 2008, he told TotalFilm that, “There will definitely be no Episodes VII–IX” – he has been consistent since 2001 that his vision trumps everything else. During an interview on the official site in March 2008, he explained his point of view.

It’s a certain story about Anakin Skywalker and once Anakin Skywalker dies, that’s kind of the end of the story. There is no story about Luke Skywalker, I mean apart from the books. But there’s three worlds: There’s my world that I made up, there’s the licensing world that’s the books, the comics, all that kind of stuff, the games, which is their world, and then there’s the fans’ world, which is also very rich in imagination, but they don’t always mesh. All I’m in charge of is my world. I can’t be in charge of those other people’s world, because I can’t keep up with it.

Fans have been complaining that this move invalidates the established canon, but what really has been canon before now? The Thrawn trilogy was “authorized” as a continuation, and multimedia events like Shadows of the Empire and The Force Unleashed had some direction from George Lucas, but aside from that everything else seems to have been handled by a licensing department.

You know what else fits this pattern? The Star Trek novels. The Marvel Cinematic Universe. 1978’s Superman film. Any of the various DC and Marvel reboots. All of them violate the established “canon” of the material that came before, and yet they exist and are still enjoyed. Just like those examples, and countless other franchise tie-ins, the stories established by the SWEU still exist. Disney and Lucasfilm aren’t burning every copy they can find or raiding public libraries for toilet paper. In fact, the existing SWEU is being republished as the “Star Wars Legends” series to guarantee their availability for the future.

Star Wars fans can learn a very valuable lesson from Star Trek fans, as author Keith R. A. DeCandido explained in his comments on this whole affair.

Two of the most highly regarded Trek novels are Imzadi and Federation. The former novel was heavily contradicted by a TNG episode (“Second Chances”); the latter was totally nuked by the movie First Contact. Yet the two novels continue to be well regarded — and so does that episode and that movie, even though they contradict each other. If you think that contradictory versions of stories in the same universe ruins one of the contradictory ones, then you don’t understand how storytelling works.

I totally get the concept of having a huge personal investment in this franchise. I owned every novel in the series before the Navy lost half of my household goods shipment back in 2005. That incident hurt, but only because of the material loss. My consolation was that the books were still out there, and someone would be selling them when I was ready to rebuild.

More importantly, this move guarantees the future of the Star Wars franchise, which cost Disney over $4 billion. That’s one hell of an investment, and they needed a way to make it accessible to general audiences again, including the newest generation of children who haven’t experience the galaxy far, far away. As much as we cannot expect audiences to read every book between Return of the Jedi and Episode VII, we cannot expect scriptwriters and directors to limit their vision to decades of contradictory stories. Those limitations would only hinder the movie and hurt the investment.

Take the example of Disney’s other major acquisition, the Marvel franchise, and their approach to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. General audiences don’t need to read the comics to get the stories, and if they need to know something, it’s presented to them. If you haven’t had a chance to read the Bloomberg Businessweek article about the MCU, I highly recommend it. There are a lot of parallels between Marvel and Star Wars.

Before this announcement, I was optimistic but skeptical about the sequel movies. There was just too much story to dance around if the EU was left intact, and I wasn’t keen on the movies being cleverly wedged between chapters or pages of a novel just to make a timeline work. This move tells me that Disney is serious about their investment and the vision they want to bring to audiences. By making this story easily accessible to everyone, which means removing the stumbling block of the now Legends stories, Disney and Lucasfilm win. That means that Star Wars fans win.

Disney and Lucasfilm helped reignite the magic of my childhood. Warm up the Falcon, Chewie, and calculate the hyperspace jump to December 2015. I’m ready to believe again. Star Wars truly is forever.

Star Wars Saga Poster by SimonZ
Star Wars Saga Poster by SimonZ

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Darth Maul and the Hollowness of Death

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Darth Maul and the Hollowness of Death
October 14, 2011

Entertainment Weekly recently posted an exclusive video that announced the return of Darth Maul to the Star Wars universe.  For those who either missed or refused to watch the prequels, Maul was a Sith Lord—the same kind of baddie as Darth Vader—who used a double-bladed lightsaber.  His first on-screen appearance was in The Phantom Menace in 1999.

In that film, a three-way lightsaber duel ended with Qui-Gon Jinn impaled through the chest and Darth Maul toppling into a deep shaft, deftly cleft in twain by the blade of Obi-Wan Kenobi.  Last January, viewers of the cartoon series Star Wars: The Clone Wars were introduced to Maul’s brother Savage Oppress (pronounced in typical Star Wars ­style as sah-VAHJ OH-press), who was a proposed apprentice to help Count Dooku overthrow his master and take control of the Dark Side of the Force.  At the end of that trilogy of episodes, viewers were told that Darth Maul was out there in the incredibly vague somewhere in the galaxy, and Oppress had to go find him.

So, apparently this means that Darth Maul does indeed live and, by some miracle, survived being cut in half by a lightsaber and falling several stories.  Insert exasperated sigh here.

Supervising director Dave Filoni told Entertainment Weekly that it makes sense in terms of Star Wars lore:

Fans will note that there is precedent for this kind of resurrection. “The Dark Side of the Force is the pathway to many abilities some consider to be…unnatural,” Darth Sidious says in Revenge of the Sith. Sidious and his master found a way to use the Force to cheat death—that’s how he was able to keep Vader alive after that little swan dive into a lava field. Couldn’t Maul have picked up on some of that too? Says Filoni, “He’s suffered through a lot to keep himself alive and implemented the training of his master to do so.”

There’s also significant financial interest for Lucasfilm in this move.  The episode(s) pertaining to Darth Maul will be aired in early 2012, and, by a cosmic coincidence I’m sure, Star Wars: The Phantom Menace in 3-D is premiering February 10, 2012.  It goes without saying that I’m annoyed by publicity stunts written into entertainment to drive interest in a related property.  Anyone else remember the martial arts episode of Star Trek: Voyager called “Tsunkatse”?  WWE Wrestler Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson was a guest star, and both WWE and Voyager were on UPN.

This entire mess—and yes, I’m calling it a mess—brings Star Wars into the realm of pointless character resurrections to drive sales.  It also revives the eternal frustrations I have with Star Wars fandom.  Since Maul was by far one of the coolest and most bad-ass characters in the prequel trilogy, the news that he would return to the franchise was understandably received with fan praise.  At the same time, others started to look at how this affects the overall quality of the franchise and aired their opinions.  In response to critical fans, some blogs, including Star Wars Underworld, questioned the “fandom” of people with differing opinions.  While I appreciate a discussion on how they plan to resurrect a character and do it well, it’s certainly not the first time that the Star Wars social media sphere has played the card of questioning how someone can be a fan of something while being critical: the hosts of The ForceCast did it numerous times before I stopped listening to the podcast back in May.

While other subsets of science-fiction and fantasy fandom can somewhat easily accept both positive and negative criticism toward the franchise of their choice, some Star Wars fans tend to follow the line of reasoning that if “you’re not with with us, you’re against us.”  It’s all fun and games until you disagree with Uncle George and refuse to drink the blue milk, and I’ve already seen backlash from refusing to buy the Star Wars Blu-Rays and my decision not to support the 3-D re-releases.  Having intelligent discussions about the positives and negatives of a franchise is one thing, but I cannot support attacking each other for having differing opinions.

The bigger problem I have with this is an issue that has plagued comic book franchises for decades, and that is in the pointless death and resurrection of characters.  In real life, religious beliefs aside, death is pretty permanent.  In storytelling, death is a result of failure, the completion of a heroic journey, or the motivation to start that journey.  In a smaller subset, that death results in a significant change of character dynamics—such as regenerations in Doctor Who, or the evolution of Gandalf in Lord of the Rings or Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars—but those deaths still carry the impact of the end of a journey and how it affects the characters around them.

Simply put, to reverse a death negates that impact and cheapens the victory for the winners.

In The Phantom Menace, Darth Maul’s death marked two important character changes:  First, it displayed Obi-Wan Kenobi’s maturity and readiness to be promoted from apprentice to Jedi Knight; second, it marked the beginnings of Anakin’s destined path.  The death of Darth Maul was a very important turning point for the Jedi themselves, as they discover that the Sith had indeed returned.

While I look forward to finding out how Filoni and company accomplish this feat, I am very skeptical about the Star Wars franchise as a whole at this point.  If Filoni proves me wrong and does this well, I will be quite amazed.  On the other hand, if this turns into yet another cheap comic book return—Superman wasn’t dead, after all, he was just resting—to sell tickets to yet another release of the Star Wars movies, then I’m done with The Clone Wars.  I have supported the show since it was announced, but for me, it would be that damaging, and since George Lucas has final approval on the show, the blame would lie solely with him.

Come 2012, we shall see.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Star Wars Fandom and The ForceCast

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Star Wars Fandom and The ForceCast
May 23, 2011

The debate over the Star Wars Expanded Universe is a tale of us versus them that’s been raging for some time, but only recently has it exploded within fandom. The Expanded Universe (EU) matters greatly to me for reasons I’ve previously discussed, but in particular because the novels were my major gateway into Star Wars fandom. Unfortunately, that segment of my fandom has fallen under attack from people I trusted.

The ForceCast has become the podcast where there is no fan left behind unless they disagree with your particular version of fandom, in which case they will publicly mock and shame you on their program.

That’s why I have no choice but to stop listening.

The ForceCast

If you haven’t heard my previous evangelism, The ForceCast is one of the best produced Star Wars podcasts on the internet.  The show is a usually weekly program for and by fans, and is the official podcast of TheForce.net and Rebelscum.com.  Despite my misgivings at times, I respect the great effort poured into the show by the hosts, the production, and the marketing.

The show expands beyond its weekly variety-style programming with dedicated podcasts about The Clone Wars, the EU, collecting, regular fandom episodes, and even Indiana Jones. The mission is “No Fan Left Behind,” and it usually shows, particularly when it comes to convention coverage.

The ForceCast has been there for me when I couldn’t go to conventions, and especially when I was deployed overseas for months at a stretch without internet access. I once handcrafted a map detailing — with all regard to operational security, of course — my travels with them and included it with a fan-made scrapbook that was presented to the hosts in appreciation of their hard work.

I’ve also been able to give back a couple of times with the ForceCast Editorial Series, where listeners are invited to write essays to explore aspects of fandom. Luckily, I’ve had two such essays published through them with great feedback from fellow fans. The first was about the lessons I’ve learned from George Lucas, and the second was a literary analysis of Padmé’s death in Revenge of the Sith.

In my personal “Dark Times”, Jason, Pete, and Jimmy, and all of the friends I’ve made worldwide through the community were my light in fandom. I just can’t say enough about the impact the majority of these wonderful people have made in my life.

The Nature of the EU

The Expanded Universe started benignly, but hasn’t always been puppy dogs and marshmallows. Surrounding the release of the original movies, publishers released novels and comics that have long since faded into a sense of obscurity because their storylines have been overridden by other stories, including the movies. As Star Wars grew in popularity, the EU exploded, and my fandom started to wane from oversaturation. The ForceCast helped by deflecting some of the attention from the EU and focusing on other aspects of the fanbase. While the majority of EU fans seem pretty low-key on the material, other fans developed a sort of blind allegiance to the stories and took umbrage when other elements of the Star Wars franchise negated parts of those stories, ranging from a paragraph to an entire chapter of a novel.

My opinion of the EU is that it’s too big and growing far too fast for some fans to keep track of. While I agree that it has a certain value, I find more value in the richness provided by the mythic story of Anakin Skywalker’s rise, fall, and redemption that is found in the six movies. That arc is the basis for everything we have at our fingertips, and it’s all thanks to the vision of George Lucas. While it can be claimed that his story is entirely derivative — honestly, it is — all the other stories in the Star Wars universe are derivative from that, and not all of them are golden nuggets that need preservation.

For some fans, it is enough to understand the six movie arc. For others, the inclusion of The Clone Wars adds something more. For an even smaller segment of fandom, the novels, comics, and games flesh out a universe rich with potential. What we need to remember is that the richness is due to people who were paid to tell a story, unique or otherwise, in the Star Wars galaxy with the understanding that they may be overruled at any point. That is standard with any tie-in media. Some of these people tried to tell simple stories and others like the infamous Karen Traviss tried to set-up elaborate seven course meals for the fans to savor over time. But at the end of the day, Star Wars belongs to one man, and if he wants to tell a different story, he is fully within his rights to tell that story regardless of what has come before.

Some fans don’t share that opinion and want something more.

The Petition of the 2000

In one episode of The Clone Wars, Jedi Master Even Piell was killed. The downside was that he played a major part in an EU novel set after Revenge of the Sith, and the episode negated both an entire chapter of the book, but also impinged on the protagonist’s motivations as a character. As a result, some fans wrote the Petition of the 2000, which politely asked George Lucas to consider the previously released Star Wars material before authorizing plot points in the ongoing animated series.

Initially, I was sympathetic to their cause because of my roots in the EU fandom. I couldn’t outright support their position because I believed that they were exercising a false sense of entitlement as fans over the creator who sparked the franchise. I cannot support telling a person how he should tell his story anymore than I support redacting Mark Twain’s work because cultural sensitivities have shifted. I don’t idolize Lucas like some sort of god, but I recognize his position as a creator and storyteller. Even in the act of asking him to bound his creations by the EU, the petitioners are asking him to stifle some degree of his efforts. By that measure, I consider the petition to be an embarrassment to me as a fan. I would be ashamed to have George Lucas read that petition and believe that it came from fandom as a whole.

I appreciated the fact that they asked in lieu of demanding a change, but I appreciate more the fact that George Lucas has said on record that the only stories that truly matter in the Star Wars franchise are his. The rest are filler for our entertainment alone, and we haven’t wasted time or money on these products if you have enjoyed them because that was their purpose. Lucasfilm is in the business of creating entertainment and making money on it, not building vast continuities spanning millennia and meticulously maintaining it because a group of 1,000 fans requested it. I see the very existence of a continuity checker like Leland Chee to be a concession to the fandom that Lucasfilm is trying, but I also see it as purely symbolic. They know at Lucasfilm who signs their paychecks, and if the continuity policies were really that strict, novels and games and comics would never contradict each other.

I don’t agree with some choices made in franchises like Harry Potter, Star Trek, Stargate, or others, but I don’t support telling the creators of these works how they should steer their properties. If I don’t like it enough, I jump off and go find something else to occupy my time. Life’s too short for that crap. I look at it like I see mythology: It’s all about the big picture, not the intricate details. There’s too much EU, and I am glad that some of it is being carved away. The very nature of working as a tie-in novelist is that your work may be superseded at any point. When you write for a franchise, you understand what is canon and what is not. The ground rules are clearly established. Avatar: The Last Airbender includes everything in-universe as canon, but series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel are only canon if on-screen, authorized by creator Joss Whedon, or written by the original writing staff. The random Buffy novel by Christie Golden is not canon, and she knew that when writing it. If you’re hired to write an Avatar project, you know going in that it’s going to be incorporated into canon. If you’re hired to write a Star Wars novel, you know that it can be overruled by a George Lucas decision.

At the end of the day, the only points I deeply care about are the ones concerned with the core mythos of Anakin Skywalker. Beyond that, they’re nice stories, but I’m not beholden to them.

The boys at The ForceCast took a slightly different approach by dissecting the argument and countering it point-by-point with Jimmy taking a more conservative approach and Jason taking his usual antagonistic stance when it comes to EU matters. The petition authors reacted by attacking the podcast hosts, exacting the “he hit me first” style of revenge. They also insulted Jason for not being well-read and having to look up certain words in the petition with a dictionary.

That’s where the petitioners lost all support from me. I never have agreed with Jason’s antagonism toward EU fans, but resorting to schoolyard bully tactics doesn’t prove the petition’s point. Quite the contrary, it dissuades me. The very structure of the “thought-out” reply from one fan to another was condescending, particularly in respect to a life-long fan. I don’t take well to people dragging another person’s intellect through the mud based on their differing views. Instead of explaining the nature of the movement in terms people can understand without resorting to a dictionary, the petitioners took to reducing two fans and their opinions to an observation on their supposed idol worship of George Lucas.

Don’t get me wrong: The ForceCast also shares part of the blame in this regard. Jason Swank seems to revel in building entertainment from spinning up fans by poking at sore points. In fact, this matter with the petition only emboldened him to become more antagonistic and condescending toward EU fans.

Overall, I believe that both sides are mired in their desire to maintain the status quo.

The Lessons of Star Trek

Star Trek got back to the basics in ’09 and if it’s truly going to be forever, the Star Wars Expanded Universe will have to as well.”

—Jason Swank (May 21, 2011 via the ForceCast Facebook page)

Star Trek started back as early as 1966 as the concept of a utopian society who learned to overcome their adversities venturing to the stars on a mission of exploration. After three seasons, the original series was cancelled but found new life in syndicated re-runs. It eventually spawned a short-lived animated series, six movies with the original series crew, and a spinoff with Star Trek: The Next Generation. After that, the franchise blossomed into four movies with the new crew and three more spinoff series.

The Next Generation started as an updated version of the original’s campy utopian fantasy, and in my opinion, after seven years it had hardly evolved beyond that. It followed Star Trek’s formula of social commentaries shrouded in science fiction, but stayed safely shy of really digging into modern topics. Deep Space Nine followed suit for the first two or three seasons, but eventually evolved into a series about war and religion, which made sense for the era in which it existed. Voyager and Enterprise reverted to the classic roots and made little to no effort to venture beyond what made the franchise so much money. While it made the classic fans happy, it didn’t bring in fresh faces. Star Trek wasn’t addressing concerns that modern science-fiction fans needed it to address. After Voyager, Enterprise, and the tenth movie Nemesis failed to expand beyond Trek’s initial charter but successfully displayed the doldrums of the writing staff, Paramount pulled the plug. For the first time in nearly twenty years, Star Trek was off the air.

Paramount fired everyone, from Rick Berman and Brannon Braga at the top to the web designers at the bottom. The franchise was dark for years until J. J. Abrams and his team rebooted it. They didn’t override what had come before, but rather reset the clock in an alternate universe and started over. They got back to the basics of what made Star Trek what it was. It was a mirror of the modern day, reflecting modern concerns on the screen with characters we knew. But, the reboot came with a price. Two major planets were destroyed (one in the original timeline, one in the new), supporting characters were killed, and character motivations were changed from where they started in the 1960s. The basics are there, but the formula is different.

Why am I mentioning this?

Because many think that the Star Wars EU is in those Voyager/Enterprise doldrums. Luke Skywalker is not the same character we saw on the silver screen, Chewbacca is dead, and the supporting cast is weary and dimensionless. The hero’s journey was completed long ago, yet people keep trying to find missions for him to complete. A story arc that could be condensed into tight trilogy or even a single large novel takes twelve or fifteen books to complete over a year or two of publication.

Maybe Star Wars needs to get back to basics, but we know such an action comes with a price. One possible offer was made, but at least one fan doesn’t want to pay.

The Death of Luke Skywalker

On May 16, a Star Wars EU fan named Tricia wrote an article entitled “Luke Skywalker Must Die” which summarized five reasons why she believed that the EU would benefit from killing off the poster child of Star Wars. Overall, I agreed with her main contention that the hero’s journey — the very backbone of the Star Wars films — has long since ended. Luke Skywalker has no real purpose in the EU aside from that of “Merlin Goes to Washington” as his character has become less hero and more politician and figurehead to a resurrected Jedi Order. Tricia’s blog post was incredibly well written and researched in my opinion, and presented her in the light of a very well-read woman. The ForceCast decided to cover this topic on their May 20 show, and included it in their teaser with the line, “EU kooks call for the death of Luke Skywalker”.

Consider a moment the use of the word “kook”. Merriam-Webster defines the term as “one whose ideas or actions are eccentric, fantastic, or insane” and cross-references to the word “screwball” among other synonyms. Also remember that Jimmy has championed a public crusade against defining members of fandom as “nerds”. Remember how embarrassed I was about the Petition of the 2000? This embarrasses me more.

As if the use of derogatory names against fellow fans wasn’t enough, The ForceCast’s official reaction was even worse. Jimmy took his normal conservative EU stance, and Jason picked us his antagonism with his usual fervor. Jason started with a blanket statement that none of the five reasons presented were good ones. While he has a right to that opinion, it became clear over the next forty-five minutes that, for lack of a better term, he just didn’t get Tricia’s argument at all.

He accused Tricia of threatening Mark Hamill when she mentioned the differences between reality and fiction, and if Jason was trying to be humorous, it wasn’t funny at all. As the ForceCast crew have discussed before, Star Wars transcends the fiction of the screen or the page and has a profound effect on everyday life. The ForceCast even runs a segment called “Star Wars in Pop Culture,” but Jason failed to realize that the death of a fictional character would spread ripples throughout the real world, even beyond the limited scope of selling more books. Such an act on behalf of Lucasfilm mirror the death of Chewbacca in Vector Prime, spurring both anger and critical thought beyond the confines of our little community, and would possibly make Star Wars more relevant than a quick nod on a sitcom. Instead of realizing that, Jason wants to call the 501st to protect Mark Hamill.

Jason suggests that perceived inability to adequately capture Luke’s character on the written page can be solved by simply finding new writers. Just, you know, pull them out of mid-air and hand them a contract because the current offering of science-fiction and fantasy novelists just don’t cut it. This solution is a cop-out, mostly because of the same reasons that other fictional epics cannot be translated to the movie screen, no matter how much we hope and pray that they can. Not all characters or plots can easily survive the transition between media, and it is possible that Luke Skywalker has some magic on the silver screen that can’t be captured on the page.

One other exchange captured my attention in its sheer audacity:

Jimmy: Because there is — and I think she brings this up later in her blog — there is this focus on Luke still, even though they’ve grown far away from the character of Luke Skywalker that we know from the films, there’s still this attention to him on all these novels that happen further and further away from the events of Return of the Jedi. If you kill him off, then that takes the focus off of his character and you could focus more on these secondary characters like Jaina Solo.

Jason: Who? What movie was she in?

Jimmy: Well, we’re talking about Star Wars Expanded Universe.

Jason: Well, we’re talking about Star Wars. [emphasis by Jason]

—Transcribed from The Weekly ForceCast for May 20, 2011 (time codes 1:29:35 to 1:30:18)

 Jason continues on to describe his irritation at fans putting aspects of the franchise into convenient little boxes, such as novels, video games, and so on. Jason lost a significant amount of my respect at this point with this contradictory argument. He wants a global overarching franchise view, but refuses to acknowledge anything beyond the films when confronted with it. He argues that Star Wars is Luke, Leia, Han, Chewie, Padmé, Anakin, and all the other film characters, but even George Lucas disagrees with him. The core of the Star Wars saga is the rise, fall, and redemption of Anakin Skywalker. The core of Star Wars is the epic tale of father and son and the ends each will go to in order to save each other.

The core of Star Wars is the hero’s journey. That’s why Lucas is so attached to Luke Skywalker.

Jason argues that Star Wars fandom extends beyond the “small group” that reads the novels, and I will agree to that with a caveat. I believe that the majority of Star Wars fans — people who enjoy Star Wars — stop at the films because that’s all they need of the franchise. I think the ones that get involved in the minutia of Star Wars fandom and the community, the ones that listen to The ForceCast and other Star Wars podcasts, and the ones that participate on discussion boards are those who we need to care about, and those are the ones who Jason is considering a splinter group.

True Fandom

I’ve been told by other ForceCast listeners that Jason’s vitriol is manufactured for the sake of entertainment and sparking discussion. There are few things I despise more than hate and vitriol for the sake of entertainment. Such tactics are disingenuous and build a core following that represents more of a lynch mob than a critical community. Even now, people on the ForceCast Facebook page are drawing a line between “EU kooks” and “true fans”.

On January 21, 2008, I asked on the ForceCast forums what comprised a Star Wars fan. Jimmy responded within an hour with the following:

“Mom, Dad, Son, Daughter, Brother, Sister, Aunt, Uncle, Cousin, Grandparent, In-Law, Teacher, Friend, Kid, Adult, Artist, PODCASTER, Doctor, Lawyer, Public Servant, Mailman, Truck Driver, Professional, Professor, Student, Filmmaker, Office Worker, Librarian, Musician, Salesman, Cabbie, Dentist, Technician, Pilot, Marketing Professional, Bus Driver, Construction Worker, Cop, Fireman, Service Clerk…

…YOU….ME…THEM…EVERYBODY….

These are the people who listen to The Force-Cast…These are the people who love Star Wars.

Universal and Undefinable.”

These are the people who Jimmy and several others after him define as fans, and I agree. There are no “true fans”, but I do see The ForceCast drawing a line in the Tatooine sand with respect to their mission. With the venom and vitriol directed toward fans of the EU by one show’s hosts, it’s quickly becoming the official statement of one of the most “influential members of Star Wars media” that EU fans are somehow less than any other fan. Ironic, considering their sponsorship by Audible, which includes many Star Wars EU titles that the hosts highlight on a weekly basis.

In my view, fandom is supposed to be fun. Fandom should be a place of sanctity from the world where I can discuss popular culture and passions without fear of reprisal or mockery. I don’t mind critical analysis, but when fandom adds the shackles of blind stereotyping and condescending critique, it becomes a weight instead of a freedom.

One example is a forty-something Star Trek fan named Rob who frequents the Blastr (formerly Sci-Fi Wire) site. Any mention of anything related to the Star Trek reboot gets his immediate condescension and troll flaming, even down to the point of offering people to come to his home in Washington, Indiana to get some sense beat into them. I don’t go there much anymore because I don’t need that amount of hate in my fandom. There are much better places to experience fandom than in an environment that fosters such negativity.

Jason has become more and more rude over recent episodes, but particularly when dealing with the EU. He was rude to Jimmy by cutting him off and stepping all over him after dominating the one-way discussion on the Luke article. Small moments of interrupting each other are acceptable when dealing with Skype, but this was downright rude.

The ForceCast also has problems with responding to feedback, and that doesn’t fly well with me as a podcaster or a fan. I have tried many times to explain my position and concerns directly to them on the channels they have established. I’ve sent e-mails. I’ve posted on their Facebook page. I’ve posted on their forums. I’ve posted to Twitter, both to the show account and their personal accounts.

I don’t need this degree of negativity or hostility toward the fandom.

The end result of this is that I will need to exercise my Star Wars fandom somewhere else. I’ll keep listening to The IndyCast because that show has been nothing but professional in all dealings, and I’ll keep frequenting the usual haunts because the majority of the listener base are good people. I’m not going to sever ties with the outstanding friends I have made just because the show that brought us together as a community is flagging.

I will come back if I have good reason to believe that The ForceCast has changed. After all they’ve done, I owe them that courtesy of seeing if they can recover.

That said, I honestly don’t expect any reply from them on or about this blog post, nor do I honestly expect anything to change.  Not when I consider how Jason has reacted in the past to those who ask him to stop the antagonism, condescension, and rude behavior. What I don’t understand is why it is even warranted.

So, here’s the bottom line: Fandom should be fun. For me, it currently is not. It’s time to change something before I lose the passion that brought me here to begin with.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – The Glory of Being a Nerd

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
The Glory of Being a Nerd
March 28, 2011

Last week, podcaster and Chicago radio producer Jimmy Mac covered the topic of being called a nerd on The ForceCast. His position was that the term nerd is derogatory and shouldn’t be used to describe fans of Star Wars. I couldn’t disagree more.

The crowd at Wikipedia have defined “nerd” as “a term that refers to a social perception of a person who avidly pursues intellectual activities, technical or scientific endeavors, esoteric knowledge, or other obscure interests, rather than engaging in more social or conventional activities.” That got me thinking. Based on that, why shouldn’t we embrace the term nerd?

My heroes have, for the most part, been largely from the scientific, engineering, and creative communities. Many of them come from the large group of scientists, engineers, and technicians who came together and put a man on the moon in the 1960s. Those same scientists and engineers saved three astronauts when Apollo 13 catastrophically failed en route to the second planned lunar landing.

Even today, the qualifications to be an astronaut include a bachelor’s degree in engineering, biological science, physical science or mathematics, as well as at least three years of related professional experience (graduate work or studies) and an advanced degree.

Wikipedia continues to explore the etymology of nerdom by describing the term’s origins with Dr. Seuss, Philip K. Dick, and students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Dr. Seuss is legendary in his own right, Philip K. Dick developed the concept of Blade Runner and other science-fiction classics, and MIT is a hotbed of scientific and technological research that has produced at least 76 Nobel Laureates, 50 National Medal of Science recipients, and 35 MacArthur Fellows.

Albert Einstein singlehandedly expanded the understanding of our universe with his theories on relativity, progressing on centuries of scientific exploration from intellectual and esoteric thinkers before him. Science fiction as developed by Isaac Asimov (a scientist and writer), Gene Roddenberry (creator of Star Trek), and George Lucas (noted for his technical innovation) is derived from these advances and evolves with the technology explored by today’s science and engineering communities.  Without nerds, I doubt science fiction or Star Wars would exist in its current form.

In a world where some kids idolize movie stars and sports figures, I find great solace in celebrating great thinkers. Nerds – the intellectuals, the scientists, the engineers, those with obscure interests – aren’t considered cool because they don’t get the hot chicks, don’t slug baseballs over the wall 400 feet away, don’t score the winning touchdown, and don’t snort cocaine off a hooker’s butt like Charlie Sheen seems so fond to do. Despite those supposed shortcomings, nerds have very stable lives and help to save others every day. Nerds develop body armor to send to our soldiers, engineer seat belts and restraint systems to keep people safe in moving vehicles, and created pacemakers and artificial hearts to extend and improve quality of life.  Nerds may not be cool, but they’re much more useful to society, and the current resurgence in exploring nerd and geek culture is a tribute to that.

Any scientific advance, including those that allow us to explore this very topic, are due greatly to nerds. Nerds may not earn millions of dollars – Bill Gates and Steve Jobs notwithstanding – but the world owes them a debt that can never be repaid.

Money can’t buy happiness, unlike my constantly expanding knowledge of the universe around me. Nerds understand what makes the world go ‘round, and I am proud to be among their ranks.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Religion in Science-Fiction

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Religion in Science-Fiction
October 21, 2010

Tiffany Vogt at Airlock Alpha recently asked, “Is Religion Killing Good Sci-Fi Shows?”  In her article, she uses three recent series – Lost, Caprica, and the Battlestar Galactica reboot – to prove her point. Now, before I go too much further, I have to admit that I haven’t watched Lost beyond the first season, although I do have the complete series set waiting on me to dive in. I also haven’t had the chance to watch Caprica beyond the pilot, although I do hear mixed reviews from friends.

But, from my experiences with Battlestar Galactica, from the 1979 and recent versions, along with entertainment like Quantum Leap, the Stargate franchise, Star Wars, and Star Trek, I have to argue no. The first thing we have to do is eliminate the “us vs. them” concept of religion and science-fiction. The important part isn’t the gadgets or technology, it’s the story. That’s what religion is based on, isn’t it? Read any holy text and you’ll find it chock full of parables with a lesson attached, much like Aesop’s Fables. Even the trope of preachers delivering the typical fire and brimstone sermon focuses on telling a tale and learning a lesson from it.

So what is science-fiction? It’s the same thing: A story with an embedded lesson or speculation on a topic with a setting different than ours. Star Wars has a mythic story arc based around the Hero’s Journey with a focus on the mystical Force, which may or may not be religious in nature. Did the element of the Force ruin Star Wars? No, it didn’t, and most detractors argue that the series wasn’t harmed until 1999 when George Lucas tried to put a scientific spin on it.

Here comes the counter-argument: Star Wars didn’t tell a story without the Force and then tack it on at the end as a convenient way out of the plot. Fine. What about Quantum Leap?

Quantum Leap tackled this overall concept by changing the setting every episode for five years, while skirting the core issue of whether it was God, Fate, Time, or a botched science experiment that was responsible for bouncing Sam back and forth within his lifetime. The only real matter was that Sam was putting right what once went wrong, and the concept of potential religious ties came second. It only really came to a head in the finale when Sam came face-to-face with what may or may not have been God, who told him the truth about his Leaping. What that a cop-out? I don’t think so at all. First, it was supposed to be a turning point for the series, leading to a sixth season with harder trials for Sam without a guide. Second, as a finale, it works because Sam finally confronts what’s been happening over the last five years and grows from the experience. He gained the confidence to take on the extra challenge that lay ahead of him, whether we saw it on screen or not.

Battlestar Galactica in its original form made no claims to be anything but a show based on religion. Every episode made reference to gods and faith; entire episodes were based around the Colonials battling an incarnation of the Devil and interacting with Beings of Light with god-like powers. The quest for Earth was based on divine prophecies and guided by the Lords of Kobol. The reboot may have been rooted deeper in scientific storytelling, but it did not refute the genesis of the story. Characters on both sides of the conflict prayed to deities and talked about faith. Roslin had drug-induced hallucinations that showed the Colonials and Cylons the path to Earth, and even if the quest was undertaken as a hollow pursuit, it became a voyage of exploration for the psyches of each character. Some characters gave up along the way, some tried to use failures and setbacks as tools for personal gain, and some, like Admiral Adama, discovered potentials that they did not know existed. Even the concept of “what has happened before will happen again” is based in mythological roots of destiny and fate that reach back beyond the religions of Ancient Greece.

Star Trek, which has always shunned religion, even took a stab at religion in a seven-year arc with Deep Space Nine, which I argue is the best of the franchise. I can’t forget the religious threads of Babylon 5, either, but having only seen the series once, I can’t comfortably explore that territory.

I think that most modern views on science fiction are built around the staples of Trek and Stargate, which have inflicted considerable and irrefutable damage with numerous stories of persons with godlike powers who are evil or corrupted, and I believe that to be one of the longest tentpoles in the “us vs them” philosophy.

Religion is, at its base, a mythology. Faith is man-made creation, built around believing in that mythology and adapting it to everyday life. Science-fiction, part of the larger genre of speculative fiction, is a mythology, whether it tells of trips through a portal that takes you to a different planet or a quest based on faith. I can’t speak for Lost, but Galactica has always been an exploration of the human condition through the strength of faith, and I don’t believe that following that exploration to Ronald Moore’s conclusion ruined the journey.

We’re not talking about proving the existence of God here, but rather the basis of sci-fi which was exploring new fantastic frontiers with the power of human ingenuity. I, for one, want to see more science-fiction that goes back to the human condition, which includes faith and religion. Removing faith and religion only serves to strip an aspect from humanity that feeds into everyday decisions, and an exploration of that result ignores crucial motivations. Faith and religion need to be a core element in explorations of human nature because they are a core element in each man, woman, and child, even if they don’t believe in a higher power.

We can’t ignore the science in science-fiction, that’s true, but not every human being is motivated purely by science, and I refuse to believe that the answers to the speculation will all immediately come from science. The religious belief that Earth was the center of the universe motivated scientists to prove it otherwise. The same stands true in part for scientists seeking life on other planets or exploring the mysteries of evolution. Religion and faith are powerful motivators and cannot be ignored or cast aside.

Books like Contact, a well-regarded science-fiction story written by a scientist, have made me realize that neither brute force method of science or religion have all the answers to the questions about humanity. I believe that an exploration based in logical reasoning with an open mind and a faith that not all the mysteries have readily observable answers will reveal more than either approach would by itself. After all, theological exploration by the main character in Carl Sagan’s only fictional work didn’t destroy the story. It made the story complete.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.

Culture on My Mind – Celebration of an Idiotic Lifestyle

Culture on My Mind

Culture on My Mind
Celebration of an Idiotic Lifestyle
September 6, 2010

On February 4, 2009, famed movie critic Roger Ebert launched his rather scathing review of the movie Fanboys. For those who don’t know, Fanboys is a film about Star Wars fans by a Star Wars fan. If you’re thinking Trekkies, then do yourself a quick favor and watch the trailer.

Trekkies was a focus on Star Trek fandom, highlighting the really wacky things they do. When I saw that film, I didn’t feel happy that someone was examining Trek fans. In fact, I wanted to melt into my chair and disappear. Trekkies implied that every fan of Gene Roddenberry’s franchise was a Starfleet uniform wearing social introvert who still lived in their parents’ basements with about fifty cats. Need I remind you of Barbara Adams, the alternate juror for the 1996 Whitewater controversy who wore her Starfleet uniform to the trial?

Apparently, this prejudicial mindset carries over to all science-fiction fandoms.

To quote Ebert’s review:

A lot of fans are basically fans of fandom itself. It’s all about them. They have mastered the “Star Wars” or “Star Trek” universes or whatever, but their objects of veneration are useful mainly as a backdrop to their own devotion. Anyone who would camp out in a tent on the sidewalk for weeks in order to be first in line for a movie is more into camping on the sidewalk than movies.

Extreme fandom may serve as a security blanket for the socially inept, who use its extreme structure as a substitute for social skills. If you are Luke Skywalker and she is Princess Leia, you already know what to say to each other, which is so much safer than having to ad-lib it. Your fannish obsession is your beard. If you know absolutely all the trivia about your cubbyhole of pop culture, it saves you from having to know anything about anything else. That’s why it’s excruciatingly boring to talk to such people: They’re always asking you questions they know the answer to.

While I defend Ebert’s right to his opinion, I have to take issue with the content. My interpretation of his words is that being involved in fandom means that you are enabled to be a social introvert. Furthermore, it enables you to have shallow relationships built on nothing more than your love of a facet of popular culture. Forget trying to build anything meaningful in a relationship because you’re incapable of doing it.

Roger Ebert, you’re doing it wrong.

In fact, Ebert went on to state:

[Fanboys] is a celebration of an idiotic lifestyle, and I don’t think it knows it.

While it is true that some science-fiction fans have trouble distinguishing between fantasy and reality, I argue that the majority of Star Wars fans do not share that problem.

First, let’s take a look at the 501st Legion, an international fan-based organization dedicated to constructing and building screen-accurate villain costumes from the Star Wars universe. At first glance, with over 4200 active members in 40 countries, one might think that this is just a worldwide Trek-esque Starfleet uniform party. That’s why they need a second glance.

From their charter:

“…The Legion is a volunteer club formed for the express purpose of bringing together costume enthusiasts and giving them a collective identity within which to operate. The Legion’s aims are to celebrate the Star Wars movies through the wearing of costumes, to promote the quality and improvement of costumes and props, and most importantly to contribute to the local community through charity and volunteer work…”

The 501st proudly contributes to charity organizations, and maintains a list on their website of groups they’ve worked with. In fact, they are famous for working with the Make-A-Wish foundation and terminally ill children.

I wonder what part of putting a smile on a young cancer patient’s face as they get to “meet” Darth Vader is idiotic. Anyone want to answer that for me?

The 501st works other events, such as conventions, for free. All they ask is that any money offered for their work is donated to a charity in their name.

Next, I focus on an astromech droid. In 2005, Jerry Greene worked with the R2 Builder’s Group to fulfill a little girl’s wish. Her name was Katie Johnson, and she had brain cancer. Her wish was to have an R2-D2 with one caveat: she wanted it pink. Soon enough, R2-KT was born.

R2-KT exists to entertain children and raise awareness for pediatric cancer. Money raised in events with R2-KT goes to Make-A-Wish and the Children’s Cancer Fund. Building on the penchant for Star Wars fans to collect, R2-KT has been made into a Hasbro action figure and a coin, the proceeds again going to charity. As of the release of Star Wars: The Clone Wars, R2-KT also entered the official canon, which is Lucasfilm acknowledging the efforts of their fans by making an icon part of history.

Again, Roger Ebert:

“Fanboys” is an amiable but disjointed movie that identifies too closely with its heroes. Poking a little more fun at them would have been a great idea. They are tragically hurtling into a cultural dead end, mastering knowledge which has no purpose other than being mastered, and too smart to be wasting their time.
When a movie’s opening day finally comes, and fanboys leave their sidewalk tents for a mad dash into the theater, I wonder who retrieves their tents, sleeping bags, portable heaters and iPod speakers. Warning: Mom isn’t always going to be there to clean up after you.

I have news for you, Roger. It may be fun for you to poke fun at Star Wars fans as we tragically hurtle toward a cultural dead end, but rest assured that we are above that. Being a Star Wars fan is not about knowing how many midichlorians Anakin Skywalker has or how many parsecs – an astronomical unit of length – it takes to make the Kessel Run. Being a Star Wars fan is about embracing the spirit of George Lucas’s vision and running with it.

I am a naval submarine officer, a faithful husband, a physicist, an engineer, a struggling author, a writer for a podcast, an Eagle Scout, and a college graduate nearly twice over. I’m also a Star Wars fan and a proud science-fiction geek. Believe me when I tell you Star Wars isn’t a lifestyle, but merely a facet of one. It’s a common ground and a solid foundation to start building relationships that mean something beyond the fantasy of pop culture.

If you spent any time at all with Star Wars fans, you would understand that we’re not about running around in costume for the hell of it or endlessly spouting lines from the films. We have social relationships that run deeper than movie scripts, most of which are developed and maintained for life. We believe in friendships that are maintained not only for the purpose of having them, and we don’t knife each other in the back when it’s convenient, unlike other fandoms.

I only wish that people could understand it instead of cowering behind their fear of diversity.

cc-break

Culture on My Mind is inspired by the weekly Can’t Let It Go segment on the NPR Politics Podcast where each host brings one thing to the table that they just can’t stop thinking about.

For more creativity with a critical eye, visit Creative Criticality.